JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 19, 2015

A- de 2015

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado

✓Claimant Empresa De Energia Del Pacifico S.A. E.S.P.·Respondent Tribunal Administrativo Del Valle Cauca En Accion De Grupo

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud Nulidad De Sentencia T-274/12.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Audiencia Publica
  • Negar por impertinente, toda vez que se cuenta con los elementos de juicio, y con las pruebas necesarias y suficientes para adoptar una decisión de fondo dentro de proceso de tutela
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Temas a tratar: Nulidad de procesos de tutela.

Se ordena denegar solicitud de nulidad por improcedente y de celebración de audiencia pública

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DENEGAR por improcedente la solicitud de nulidad de todas las actuaciones surtidas dentro del proceso T-2.972.159 solicitada por la Corporacion Autonoma Regional del Valle del Cauca.
  2. Segundo. DENEGAR la solicitud de celebracion de una audiencia publica dentro del proceso de la referencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.